There was, at least up to 8 March 2023, a general unanimity about the fact that the attack on the Nord Stream 1 & 2 on 26 September 2022 was an act of “state terrorism”. Both the Danish and the Swedish authorities investigating the case said that the destruction was enormous. The explosion at a depth of about 80 meters was registered as an earthquake of 2.3 on the Richter scale. It was registered as far north as the northern tip of Sweden 1600 km further north. The pipelines were
Wonderful and reliable description of the facts around the first and most Act of War against Europe since WWII and before... The economic repercussions against our Continent are enormous as against the policies we, as european citizens, have appreciated and shared regarding the strategic relationships with Russia and Eurasia.
It clearly and strongly shows the level of Nazism that lives inside USA Governments, Agencies and many of american citizen that support them.
Thanks a lot, I posted today the italian translation of your great article that deserve more diffusion.
thanks for this piece--incredibly dense and informative.
Here's my question for you: while I 'buy' the arguments you write about Norway and its (deep state) movers, my sense is this--since you also mention the Swedish navy's activities and all but imply their participation, what are the odds that the U.S. had brought in the Norwegians, Danes, Swedes, and Poles (as well as possibly some German deep state actors, but quite likely not Scholz) without putting them in touch with each other?
In other words: do you think it feasible/plausible that the Norwegians, Danes, Swedes, and Poles would all be approached independently of each other with the U.S. promising whatever to each of them?
Ola Tunander, there are seven words in quotation marks in your text. You wrote this: Sy Hersh says that some people “in Denmark and Sweden were also briefed”. I cannot find the seven words “in Denmark and Sweden were also briefed” in any text written by Seymour Hersh. Where do they come from? I apologise if I have overlooked something that SH has written or said.
That the NYT failed to mention the existence of the Hersh article even to discredit it was the biggest red flag for me. Such blatant textbook VOA-style ‘reporting’ should be an embarrassment, but somehow isn’t in this case?
After Seymour Hersh’s article
Wonderful and reliable description of the facts around the first and most Act of War against Europe since WWII and before... The economic repercussions against our Continent are enormous as against the policies we, as european citizens, have appreciated and shared regarding the strategic relationships with Russia and Eurasia.
It clearly and strongly shows the level of Nazism that lives inside USA Governments, Agencies and many of american citizen that support them.
Thanks a lot, I posted today the italian translation of your great article that deserve more diffusion.
https://propagator.substack.com/p/dettagliatissima-ricostruzione-di
Hei Ola,
thanks for this piece--incredibly dense and informative.
Here's my question for you: while I 'buy' the arguments you write about Norway and its (deep state) movers, my sense is this--since you also mention the Swedish navy's activities and all but imply their participation, what are the odds that the U.S. had brought in the Norwegians, Danes, Swedes, and Poles (as well as possibly some German deep state actors, but quite likely not Scholz) without putting them in touch with each other?
In other words: do you think it feasible/plausible that the Norwegians, Danes, Swedes, and Poles would all be approached independently of each other with the U.S. promising whatever to each of them?
I think Støre should be asked why he cancelled the trip. Do you know if anyone has done that?
(I tried it myself but so far got no reply.)
Ola Tunander, there are seven words in quotation marks in your text. You wrote this: Sy Hersh says that some people “in Denmark and Sweden were also briefed”. I cannot find the seven words “in Denmark and Sweden were also briefed” in any text written by Seymour Hersh. Where do they come from? I apologise if I have overlooked something that SH has written or said.
That the NYT failed to mention the existence of the Hersh article even to discredit it was the biggest red flag for me. Such blatant textbook VOA-style ‘reporting’ should be an embarrassment, but somehow isn’t in this case?