5 Comments
author

When agreements are so secret that they are only possible to express orally, then there is no formal violation of law and no legal entity that is able to enforce discipline. Accordingly, extra-legal use of force is applicable to any region.

Expand full comment

You write:

"These echelons of extreme secrecy of the security state tend to develop into levels of oral agreements, and such oral agreements will be kept by making its participants enforcing discipline by the use of extra-legal threats and violence executed by a power entity we call the “deep state.""

I know that you have mentioned several times that your friend and colleague Robert Bathurst died unexpectedly after having been warned "not to touch the subject" of submarine incursions, which I interpret as a hint that you think something like this might have happened to him.

Can you think of any examples from Scandinavia where this (strange deaths) might have happened, or is this just applicable for other regions of the world?

Expand full comment

Excellent artice.

Expand full comment

''Spectacular domination’s first priority was to make historical knowledge in general disappear; beginning with just about all rational information and commentary on the most recent past. The evidence for this is so glaring it hardly needs further explanation. With mastery the spectacle organizes ignorance of what is about to happen and, immediately afterwards, the forgetting of whatever has nonetheless been understood. The most important is the most hidden. ''

Guy Debord, Comments on the Society of the Spectacle

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/guy-debord-comments-on-the-society-of-the-spectacle#fn2

Expand full comment

This is great, Ola! You have my deep respect and admiration for devoting your career to exploring these heavily suppressed issues--matters which are of existential significance to humanity!

Expand full comment